The Implications Of A Perry Ellis Lawsuit On The Company He Worked For

A former Perry Ellis employee has brought a lawsuit against his former employer, alleging that he was unfairly treated while working for the company. The lawsuit by Joseph Cook, who was director of sales at the Perry Ellis company and is also gay, paints a vivid picture of the role of the company’s president and current CEO, Neil Hamilton, in an alleged anti-gay witch hunt carried out by his superiors. The allegations, which are covered under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) include ageism, discrimination and retaliation. If you believe that you have been a victim of such activities at work, it is important that you contact a qualified attorney who will be able to assess your case and give you advice on how best to proceed with the filing of a lawsuit.

Perry Ellis Lawsuit

The lawsuit filed by Cook claims that in the eighties, at a time when the company was primarily a Christian enterprise, senior executives pursued the hiring of conservative business personnel in order to increase bottom-line profits by avoiding hiring liberal or progressive-minded people.

According to the lawsuit, gay employees were routinely passed over for promotions and transfers to lower ranked departments, despite the fact that they had the skills and experience required for the job. Cook further claims that in the last decade, gay people were denied promotions and transfers at a higher rate than non-heterosexuals. He further states that in addition to discriminating against the employees on the basis of their sexual orientation, gay executives were also discouraged from promoting people based on their political views, their religion or their ethnic background. The allegations brought forth in the lawsuit filed against Perry Ellis have been strongly denied by the company has hired an attorney to look into the matter.

Cook further claims that the policies adopted by the company promote racism, sexism and homophobia.

He points out that the company’s recruitment and orientation policy explicitly state that they do not discriminate based on race, color, religion, national origin or age. Moreover, according to the policy, an employee is not discriminated against if that employee doesn’t want to pursue a particular career, but simply cannot choose to work in the company due to other factors such as health issues, disability or medical history. According to Cook, the policies do not actually offer any employment benefits to someone who violates it.

As of now, the lawsuit filed against Perry Ellis is still pending and the results will most likely be damaging for the company.

If successful, Cook may have to sue the company for violating his right to equal opportunity due to his former discriminatory actions. In the meantime, the result of this will also harm the companies other minority employees who are badly affected by the company’s policies on hiring. This lawsuit, if allowed to drag on, could deter other similar businesses from considering pursuing a hire from a person that has previous experience with discrimination due to his sexual orientation, which affects the company’s overall image.

A second incident that shows how harmful this lawsuit is to the plaintiff is the fact that the defendant-company in this case, Intuit, has admitted that they broke the law in terms of their mandatory applicant selection process.

They maintained that the selection process in their applicant tracking system was fair because it included an automated system of selecting applicants that was non-discriminatory. However, the suit says that the former executive’s lawsuit was thrown out because the policy was not an inclusive company policy. According to Cook, the policy was inadequate because it only applied to people within the company and was thus not a nondiscriminatory policy. Consequently, he feels that the plaintiffs were treated unfairly.

One possible negative outcome of the lawsuit filed by Perry Ellis is the implication that his former supervisor was somehow responsible for the breach of employment contract.

According to Cook, however, the evidence points to the fact that the breach was committed by the senior executive. Furthermore, the attorney feels that the breach of contract could have been easily avoided. In terms of the claim that the plaintiff was injured due to this breach of contract, Cook says that it may be possible to receive a claim for medical bills that exceed the general guidelines set forth by prevailing statutes, but that amount may also be tied to the general prevailing statutes, such as overtime pay and worker’s compensation. For these reasons, Cook believes that the lawsuit filed against him may be “baseless and meritless.”

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Lawyd is for people actively seeking legal information or advice and connects them with qualified attorneys or law firms. Get the best Law, Lawyer and Legal Resource. doesn't offer any legal advice. The info PROVIDED ON THIS SITE is solely for individual education & understanding of the legal issues involved and shouldn't be considered as legal advise. Don't rely upon or act on the said info without taking pro legal advice relating to your own particular situation. You must consult with your own legal counsel for guidance on the application of this info to your own specific case. The site owner/content writers or anyone associated with this site isn't responsible for any errors or omissions in the contents.