Lawsuit Against Menards

A recent federal judge has slapped the proverbial shut on the Illinois lawsuit against Menards that claimed it misled them with its false and misleading descriptions of their 4x4s as lumber for construction projects. Saying that no reasonable consumer would consider the descriptions of the lumber from the company’s website the way plaintiffs Vladislav Krasilski and Michael Fuchs claimed they did, a federal court judge on Dec. 5th dismissed the class action lawsuit brought against Menards by the Chicago-area homeowners who claimed that they were cheated out of their hard-earned money.

Menards has always been willing to acknowledge that their advertisements and their claims in them are completely accurate. Their customers, of course, will not buy the lumber from the company unless it has been described as “manufactured to Menards specifications.” This is something that every customer should be aware of, especially if the lumber is intended to be used in a home or building project.

If the lumber was actually manufactured by another company with the same specifications that Menards is using then Menards would have no problem admitting that they deceived their customers and allowing them to buy their lumber without having to pay any extra price. That’s not the case at all, however. The company still faces a large number of complaints from satisfied customers and has been found liable in several different lawsuits filed by their own customers.

The first lawsuit was filed in the state of Wisconsin on behalf of the owners of a wooded area in Ashwaubenon called Deerfield Beach. A woodworking shop owner had installed a Menards lumber-fabricator at his work site and allowed his customers to purchase wood for their home projects through the catalog. Once the customers took the lumber home and tried to build something from it, they discovered that the lumber had a different density than that described in the catalog description. They also discovered that some of their lumber was too light to support a building and that some pieces were simply too large for their project.

The lawsuit was a class action suit which required that Menards make a settlement out of the damages it owed the homeowners. or else the case was going to trial. After the Menards lumber company failed to do so, the case was dropped. and no settlement was made.

The second lawsuit was brought against Menards on behalf of the homeowners of a lake area in Waukegan who purchased lumber from a lumbering operation that they hired for the job of clearing the lake of debris. They had no problem with the lumber being purchased from that operation but discovered that it was not exactly what they wanted to use. They went ahead and bought the wood, but later discovered that the wood wasn’t what they expected when they finished the job. After they filed for a lawsuit against the lumberyard owner, they discovered that the company they hired had failed to accurately describe their product.

Because they were dissatisfied with the results they got after buying lumber from the mill, they filed for a settlement because they felt that it was a good thing to do. A jury awarded them $1.3 million in damages. That verdict was later reduced to just over $250,000 because the company admitted that it was not the wood they were purchasing that was wrong but the fact that they misquoted the dimensions of the woods they sold to customers. When this happened, the amount was reduced to just under one thousand dollars and was reduced even further because the jury didn’t feel that the company was really at fault. for misleading customers.

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Lawyd is for people actively seeking legal information or advice and connects them with qualified attorneys or law firms. Get the best Law, Lawyer and Legal Resource. doesn't offer any legal advice. The info PROVIDED ON THIS SITE is solely for individual education & understanding of the legal issues involved and shouldn't be considered as legal advise. Don't rely upon or act on the said info without taking pro legal advice relating to your own particular situation. You must consult with your own legal counsel for guidance on the application of this info to your own specific case. The site owner/content writers or anyone associated with this site isn't responsible for any errors or omissions in the contents.