Hot Coffee Lawsuits

You’ve probably heard about the McDonald’s hot coffee lawsuit, but did you know that the McDonald’s coffee was so hot that it could melt flesh, muscle, and skin? John Stossel reported the story on his show, “Inside the McD” a few years ago, and the media went wild. The McDonald’s hot coffee lawsuit is not the only hot coffee lawsuit. McDonald’s has been sued by hundreds of people over its coffee quality.

Stella Liebeck sued McDonald’s

In 1992, a woman named Stella Liebeck suffered third-degree burns on more than 16 percent of her body after she was served a cup of hot coffee at a McDonald’s restaurant. She sued McDonald’s for damages and won. McDonald’s paid a large settlement to Liebeck. Her case has been the subject of seventy-five lawsuits. The coffee she was served at McDonald’s was over-heated, and she was severely burned.

After a trial, a jury awarded Liebeck $160,000 in compensatory damages. The jury ruled that McDonald’s was 80 percent at fault, and she was only 20 percent at fault for spilling the coffee. The jury also awarded her $2.7 million in punitive damages, which equaled two days of McDonald’s coffee sales. Later, the parties settled for an undisclosed amount.

McDonald’s settled for less than $600,000

In a McDonald’s coffee case, a woman was burned by spilled hot coffee. The coffee reaches 190 degrees Fahrenheit, causing third-degree burns. Her lawsuit against the fast-food chain was initially rejected when she was offered $800 to cover medical bills. However, after a jury trial, the company settled the lawsuit for less than $600,000, saying it had changed its heating system.

The jury awarded Stella McDonald $160,000 in compensatory damages and $2 million in punitive damages. However, the trial judge reduced her punitive damages to $480,000. Eventually, the case settled out of court for less than $600,000 – a small amount, but still a substantial payout. The jury verdict reflects the disgraceful treatment she received from the defendant.

Starbucks is represented by an attorney

A woman in Texas is suing Starbucks for the hot coffee she drank. Katherine Mize was buying coffee for her colleagues when she was burned by a spilled cup. She was in the drive-through line because she had to volunteer work that day and was rushing to make it. Unfortunately, the hot coffee spilled on her face and burned her skin. A lawsuit has been filed against Starbucks, alleging negligence and strict product liability.

The family was enjoying a drink from Starbucks when the incident occurred. They came home and found a red smear on a white cup. The family also noticed a metallic smell in the cup. The family called the Starbucks location and learned that the employee had bled on the sales floor. Starbucks’ management was informed of the occurrence and removed the employee from the sales floor. The family filed a lawsuit alleging negligence and fraud, but they were ultimately unsuccessful.

Starbucks changed how it heats its coffee

Starbucks has a problem with coffee. Most of its coffee is over-roasted and bitter. They often use stale coffee beans to mask the taste of the drink with sugar, cream, and other high-calorie embellishments. This practice has led to many people comparing Starbucks coffee to McDonald’s coffee. While many coffee connoisseurs still scour Starbucks for a great cup of Joe, you can easily find a better cup for a fraction of the price.

While in high school, Josephine Liz worked for Starbucks and noticed that customers wanted their drinks super-hot. This way, they could enjoy them while on the go. However, coffee makers are not allowed to exceed certain temperatures for safety and quality reasons. So, the company changed its coffee brewing process. Eventually, this method will be implemented at all Starbucks locations. In the meantime, Starbucks will continue to develop new technologies to make its coffee even better.

The defendants did not adequately warn people about the temperature of the coffee

The McDonald’s case illustrates how ordinary conduct can create extraordinary liability. Morgan argued that McDonald’s breached a duty owed to Liebeck and caused her harm by serving hot coffee at too high a temperature. Defendants must have known about the dangers of hot coffee and failed to warn her about them. Because McDonald’s sold Liebeck’s coffee, they owed her a duty to provide her with safe coffee.

Despite these dangers, McDonald’s continued to serve hot coffee to customers, despite being aware of their potential for serious burns. The McDonald’s quality assurance manager testified that any coffee that was served hot was dangerous. This means McDonald’s should have been required to warn customers about the dangerous temperature of their coffee. Although this lawsuit was won on a technicality, the court held that McDonald’s’ failed to warn people about the coffee’s temperature.

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Lawyd is for people actively seeking legal information or advice and connects them with qualified attorneys or law firms. Get the best Law, Lawyer and Legal Resource. doesn't offer any legal advice. The info PROVIDED ON THIS SITE is solely for individual education & understanding of the legal issues involved and shouldn't be considered as legal advise. Don't rely upon or act on the said info without taking pro legal advice relating to your own particular situation. You must consult with your own legal counsel for guidance on the application of this info to your own specific case. The site owner/content writers or anyone associated with this site isn't responsible for any errors or omissions in the contents.