Experian Data Breach Lawsuits

If you have been impacted by the massive data breach and identity theft service Experian, you may want to consider filing a lawsuit against them. The company has failed to notify consumers of a breach that took place over nine months in 2013. The breach was caused by Hieu Minh Ngo, who operated an online identity theft service by posing as a licensed private investigator in the United States. The breach exposed the personal information of tens of millions of people.

Experian data breach

The City of San Diego has filed an Experian data breach lawsuit against the company, alleging that the firm did not notify consumers of a massive data breach. The company, which provides credit reports, was allegedly breached by a subsidiary in the nine months ending in 2013. The identity theft victim, Hieu Minh Ngo, ran an identity theft service online and posed as a licensed private investigator in the United States.

In this data breach lawsuit, consumers are seeking compensation for the damage to their personal information. The company will be required to reimburse affected consumers for the loss of income and brand value. It may also face fines. The value of information is a crucial corporate asset and failing to manage it properly can result in a diminished value and a reduced competitive advantage. This lawsuit seeks to remedy these problems and restore consumer trust. Although the Experian data breach was only the latest in a long string of similar incidents affecting consumers, it is significant because it exposes the company’s poor cybersecurity.

Experian identity theft service

A class-action lawsuit has been filed against Experian for violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by failing to give consumers notice that their information is being misused. The plaintiffs also want the court to require the company to provide free credit monitoring services to all consumers affected by the data breach, as well as to set up a fund that will reimburse victims of identity theft for the time they spent remediating the problem.

The data breach at Experian involved the sale of confidential consumer information to a Vietnamese fraudster who resold it to other crooks. The company was sued by Maudie Patton and three other plaintiffs. Ngo was convicted in New Hampshire of 15 counts of fraud. She was sentenced to 13 years in prison on July 14.

Experian RentBureau

The Experian Rent Bureau lawsuit filed by plaintiffs in New York will likely involve several parties. The company has a history of providing the contents of the file to people who request it. This includes rental history. However, the company’s failure to provide this information to people has led to several consumer complaints. This lawsuit could lead to real reform, including the disclosure of trade secrets and the release of consumer reports.

Whether Experian RentBureau should be held accountable is a highly debatable question. The company’s rental collection data is often inaccurate. For example, the company incorrectly identifies residents who skip a rental payment as “rent-specific debt” to facilitate the collection of the unpaid debt. This may lead to an increase in bad-debt recovery for collections firms and property owners. The company should immediately cease using the inaccurate information and provide an accurate credit report to everyone who applies for rental housing.

Experian’s failure to report tax liens

The National Consumer Protection Act imposed strict standards for credit reporting companies and has led to a large number of consumer complaints. This infringement of privacy has caused many consumers to be denied access to their credit reports. Credit reporting companies are required to report public records accurately and transparently. In this case, a consumer’s credit report may contain inaccurate tax liens. Experian admitted to the problem and removed the tax liens from its database. However, many consumers still believe this information is inaccurate and should be removed.

The new rules are designed to help consumers obtain a higher credit score. Tax liens are one of the most common types of judgments on credit reports, but they are a risk to your credit score. As a result, the credit reporting agencies are now removing data for up to 50% of all tax liens. The reason for the deletion is because the costs of maintaining compliance and the risks of lawsuits were too high.

Experian’s failure to report civil judgments

After a lawsuit from a Florida resident alleged that Experian Information Solutions Inc. (Experian) had failed to properly report a civil judgment against her, the company must now face the Fair Credit Reporting Act suit. In the suit, the plaintiff alleged that Experian failed to conduct a minimal investigation and therefore failed to report the judgment on her credit report. Despite her repeated requests, Experian’s agent had failed to report the judgment against her on her credit file.

The plaintiff alleged that Experian’s failure to report a civil judgment against her hurt her credit score. The district court found that the company had not violated the FCRA and granted summary judgment in favor of Experian. The plaintiff is now seeking a trial by jury. The trial judge will rule on this appeal and he will decide whether to grant Experian’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit.

Experian’s failure to alert consumers

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued a new set of rules concerning credit reporting agencies and has ruled that Experian failed to protect consumers from inaccurate information on their reports. The rule states that credit reporting agencies must use reasonable procedures to ensure the maximum accuracy of their data. Experian failed to do so in this case. In its complaint, the plaintiff claimed that the company failed to identify and address inaccurate information and failed to notify consumers of incorrect debt information.

The Dalton case addressed the issue of whether a report was misleading and therefore hurt a consumer. Experian must explain to consumers how such a report can adversely affect them. In a pending appeal, a fact finder may rule that Experian discharged its obligations because its response and investigation were reasonable. A ruling by the FTC is not final, but it will likely be helpful to consumers.

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Lawyd is for people actively seeking legal information or advice and connects them with qualified attorneys or law firms. Get the best Law, Lawyer and Legal Resource. Lawyd.com doesn't offer any legal advice. The info PROVIDED ON THIS SITE is solely for individual education & understanding of the legal issues involved and shouldn't be considered as legal advise. Don't rely upon or act on the said info without taking pro legal advice relating to your own particular situation. You must consult with your own legal counsel for guidance on the application of this info to your own specific case. The site owner/content writers or anyone associated with this site isn't responsible for any errors or omissions in the contents.
Lawyd
Logo
Enable registration in settings - general
Compare items
  • Cameras (0)
  • Phones (0)
Compare